China's cyber police have intensified controls over the country's 100 million Internet users in the past few months but that hasn't stopped Western Web firms from pushing ever farther into the booming market.
Rather than using their clout to help push the boundaries of free speech and information in the one-party state, critics say companies like Google, Yahoo Inc. and Microsoft Corp. are at best turning a blind eye to the machinations of the cyber police.
"It's too early to say that just by doing business in China and developing the Internet in China they will foster democracy and human rights," said Julien Pain, of media watchdog Reporters Without Borders.
"It doesn't work that way."
Indeed, the group says there is evidence the opposite is happening, with the major Web players accused in the past of pre-empting the government by routinely blocking discussions on sensitive subjects from the 1989 democracy movement to the spiritual group Falun Gong.
China has blocked access to the Website Google News to force surfers to use the Chinese version of the site, which removes politically sensitive reports.
Microsoft's "MSN Spaces" came under fire for censoring phrases like "human rights" and "Taiwan independence" from the subject lines of its free online journals.
And most recently, Yahoo was accused of supplying data to Chinese authorities that was used as evidence against Shi Tao, a journalist sentenced to 10 years in prison for sending an internal Communist Party message by e-mail abroad.
Yahoo says it was only abiding by local laws. But rights groups say the company, which agreed last month to pay $1 billion (560 million pounds) for a 40 percent stake in Chinese Web auctioneer Alibaba.com, is complicit in a system bent on curtailing, not expanding, Internet freedoms.
REAL NAMES, REAL DANGERS
Since March, online discussion groups at Chinese universities have turned into internal platforms open only to students, in accordance with a demand from the Ministry of Education.
The groups now require users and managers to register with their real names.
Website owners now also are required to register within 30 days of their launch, part of a campaign begun in July that also includes a Website census conducted by China's cyber police, a force created to monitor sites, servers and registrars.
"The registration requirement issued by the Information Ministry is aimed at not-for-profit Websites, including personal Websites and blogs," Southern Weekend newspaper reported.
"It shows the extreme concern from the central leaders of Internet work," the paper said. Analysts say the regulations are aimed at extending the tentacles of state control to blogs since not only blog communities but individuals who create their own blogs are subject to registration -- and therefore to censorship.
"I am against the online 'real name system' ... because the real point of this regulation is to control and even threaten Internet users who say things that jeopardise the government's interests," said Anti, an active online blogger.
The sentencing of Shi Tao in April and conviction in July of dissident Zhang Lin for jeopardising national security with his Internet posts make clear the threat from speaking out in the relative anonymity of the Internet is real.
But critics say the reach of the state control in cyberspace is almost beside the point, with the new regulations and the example of a few cases like Zhang and Shi more important for the culture of caution they promote.
"The most important problem is self-censorship," Pain said.
"There are very few Chinese Internet users who dare to talk about politics knowing they can be caught."
(Additional reporting by Vivi Lin)
Return to internet news headlines
View Internet News Archive