Sales
0161 215 3700
0800 458 4545
Support
0800 230 0032
0161 215 3711
Fast Chat

Welcome to UKFast, do you have a question? Our hosting experts have the answers.

Sarah Wilson UKFast | Account Manager

Internet giants reject Clause 17 of the Digital Economy Bill

Internet giants reject Clause 17 of the Digital Economy Bill

Major Internet giants, including Google, Yahoo, eBay and Facebook, have issued an open letter that strongly rejects Clause 17 of the UK government's new Digital Economy Bill, which would give the Secretary of State (i.e. Peter Mandelson) sweeping powers to amend Copyright law without hardly any debate.

Dear Lord Mandelson,

As the providers of online services used by millions of people in the UK, we are enthusiastic supporters of the impressive ambitions set out in the Digital Britain report.

As the Digital Economy Bill has its Second Reading in the House of Lords today, we want to express our grave concerns regarding the inclusion of measures which risk stifling innovation and damaging the Government's vision for a Digital Britain.

We strongly share the Government's belief that an open Internet available to all and offering consumers the broadest range of innovative services brings huge social and economic benefits. We support measures to ensure this common goal. We are also convinced that the value of copyright will help unlock the potential for Digital Britain. Our companies play an active role in adapting content distribution models to the online environment and partner with providers, including the music and film sectors. A shared respect for copyright is, of course, key.

We fear, however, that the unexpected new clauses of the Digital Economy Bill will hinder, rather than contribute to, the Government's vision. In particular, we believe the bill's Clause 17 - which gives any future Secretary of State unprecedented and sweeping powers to amend the Copyright, Design and Patent Act - opens the way for arbitrary measures. This power could be used, for example, to introduce additional technical measures or increase monitoring of user data even where no illegal practice has taken place. This would discourage innovation, impose unnecessary costs, potentially unsettling the careful balance of responsibilities for enabling market change which Lord Carter outlined in the Digital Britain report.

This clause is so wide that it could put at risk legitimate consumer use of current technology as well as future developments. We all acknowledge that new business models need to emerge to support creative content. They are inherently risky and entrepreneurs rely heavily on there being a consistent and stable approach to copyright enforcement. This clause would inject an unprecedented level of uncertainty in this regard.

The industry as a whole had hoped that the outcome of Digital Britain would be a clear, workable set of principles by which the industry could operate. On the contrary, Clause 17 creates uncertainty for consumers and businesses and puts at risk the UK's leading position in a digital Europe.

We urge you to remove Clause 17 from the bill.

Yours sincerely,

Alasdair McGowan, Head of Public Affairs, eBay UK,

Richard Allan, Director of Policy, Europe, Facebook

Emma Ascroft, Director, Public & Social Policy, Yahoo! UK & Ireland

Sarah Hunter, UK Policy Manager, Google

Many are now starting to suspect that Clause 17 could end up being the sacrificial lamb of the Bill in future amendments, thus allowing other elements - such as the controversial disconnection policy - to remain in place. However it's still too early to tell, though yesterdays second reading in the Lords saw a number of individuals raise concerns about Clause 17.


print this article

Return to hosting news headlines
View Hosting News Archive

Share with: